DSP Robotics Support

DigiTonix wrote:Maybe you're right, I'm not familiar with robotics but... isn't there a 64 bits is not necessary? if they want something let them do as they want...
But I would like to have open source code in this case! (Find an awesome programmer to decompile heh heh)
Then we could all make a Flow for yourself!... Isn't that a good idea?

Yes, I wish I knew how to do that! I've done some research on the web and found nothing that could decompile plugins. That would be a god send!

knozzers wrote:Also, I would think about 32/64 Bit compatibility from the hardware driver aspect. Does a 32 Bit audio application (DAW), if installed under 64 Bit OS (if that is possible for DAWS) run smoothly with 64 Bit ASIO drivers ? Or are there problems ? That is something I would expect, but I have currently no experience, because I am not allowed to install something like that on my workstation (company owned).

I don't have my own experiences, but the makers of my DAW once made a blog entry that dealt with exactly those questions, and their answer was pretty clear. All that matters are two things:

1. How much RAM do you need? (In the DAW, not the system)
2. Are all your plugins 64-bit?

If all your plugins are 32-bit and you don't need more than ~ 2GB for the DAW, then a 32-bit DAW on a 64-bit Windows is to be preferred. Pretty much all DAWs work with 64-bit engines internally anyway, no matter the version you use, so are happily communicating with a 64-bit ASIO as well.

The issue is not the Hosts ... it is the need for a 32->64 Bridge.

Use of a Bridge can cause the 'simplest' of problems ... [for one] 'Plug-In Focus'.

Host like Reaper do have the Em-bed option, which helps ... but not all DAWs.

Also, many DAW's do not have built-in Bridges, so that requires a user to purchase additional software. That can cause a hit on market-ability.

I just bought Flowstone the other day , to be honest i did not imagine that it did not support 64bit.
Not complaining , just saying.

Cheers everyone!

I would fully support 64 Bit development and even pledge for it.

As I am a professional producer, electronic performer, sound-designer, tech_writer, mixing- and mastering engineer I have a profound knowledge and experience about audio mixing and signal-paths but I am not seeing myself diving into C++ codeing too much, as I am always quite busy with my different activities...

Will this ever happen? Crossing fingers!

http://bobhumid.de

This software is clearly dead. Sorry.

CoreStyler wrote:This software is clearly dead. Sorry.

You could write it somewhere else? Be sure to have to write this here? Or do you have nothing Activities? I'm sorry but these phrases begins to enrage. Peace for everyone.

anjey_olaf wrote:You could write it somewhere else? Be sure to have to write this here? Or do you have nothing Activities? I'm sorry but these phrases begins to enrage. Peace for everyone.

You misunderstood...
I don't care about the future of the software, i don't need it.
I just want to share my consideration... Peace of mind, you know.

So if you think things will come, just wait.

CoreStyler wrote:

anjey_olaf wrote:You could write it somewhere else? Be sure to have to write this here? Or do you have nothing Activities? I'm sorry but these phrases begins to enrage. Peace for everyone.

You misunderstood...
I don't care about the future of the software, i don't need it.
I just want to share my consideration... Peace of mind, you know.

So if you think things will come, just wait.

I'll wait. I believe. Everything will be fine. I still have enough FS 3.8.1 to complete my very large Projects and only on FS complexity and architecture.

anjey_olaf wrote:I'll wait. I believe. Everything will be fine. I still have enough FS 3.8.1 to complete my very large Projects and only on FS complexity and architecture.

Go on!
You will learn alot of things using this product, you'll get confident with programming and then, if you will be a programmer, you'll get what i said.