If you have a problem or need to report a bug please email : support@dsprobotics.com
There are 3 sections to this support area:
DOWNLOADS: access to product manuals, support files and drivers
HELP & INFORMATION: tutorials and example files for learning or finding pre-made modules for your projects
USER FORUMS: meet with other users and exchange ideas, you can also get help and assistance here
NEW REGISTRATIONS - please contact us if you wish to register on the forum
The old but never satisfyingly answered question
23 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: The old but never satisfyingly answered question
Spogg wrote:Dare we conclude that cross-fading is type of morphing, or should I duck for cover?
It should only called cross-fading once the controversy has made everyone cross enough! [ducking]
tulamide wrote:...the second is a blend...
For a concise control name, I find "blend" very fitting - descriptive and suggesting something slightly more involved than a static oscillator "mix".
tulamide wrote:trog just gave the ultimate answer: a big knob labelled "morph"
If not quite as succinctly as Adam's visuals! I'm a great believer in the old saying; "1000 words is worth a picture!" (or is it the other way around?)
All schematics/modules I post are free for all to use - but a credit is always polite!
Don't stagnate, mutate to create!
Don't stagnate, mutate to create!
-
trogluddite - Posts: 1730
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 12:46 am
- Location: Yorkshire, UK
Re: The old but never satisfyingly answered question
.
Last edited by MichaelBenjamin on Mon Sep 21, 2020 10:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
- MichaelBenjamin
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 1:32 pm
Re: The old but never satisfyingly answered question
.... and of course, I hesitate the mention of:
'Dissolve'
'Dissolve'
- RJHollins
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:58 pm
23 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests