Re: anyone know an optimized reverb?
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:26 am
djbrynte wrote:thnx will try those. But do i just put the asm code inside the stock delay?
yes, just copy paste the code into a asm component and it should be ready to go. It is just the core of the delay - receives the input(s) and amount(s) of samples to delay - the knobs'n'stuff you'll have to make yourself.
There are 6 different types of delay, with varying degree of optimization and capabilities. First is a fixed delay, second is also a fixed delay, which is set at first sample (called semi-fixed) and then normal conventional delay module (in functionality similar to stock delays). All 3 come in 2 versions - either mono - which also work for poly and mono4, but all channels are delayed by the same amount and mono4/poly version, where delay of each channel is independent. Obviously more functions = more CPU, but The delays are heavily optimized - I highly doubt you'll save much CPU unless you use a few hundred of them.
djbrynte wrote:Must say martins reverb used 2% lesser cpu
Martin meant it uses 30% of what stock reverb uses. If stock reverb uses 3% on FS CPU meter, then this one should use 1% ( =2% less).