DSP Robotics Support

tester wrote:check the mystery

The mystery at the moment seems to be the X11.
An awefull big task to identify exactly what's responsible.

tester wrote: you must create a "test design", so that someone else may see/hear the same results on first place

I was thinking an easier way, maybe to start with a vsti, then keep adding parts one by one,
testing all the while, and keep going till we see that "gel" factor happen, and that 1 sample error
gets eliminated.
I'm thinking maybe the Ruby module on it's own, might be a bit "lazy", and when it's suddenly got more action
around it, it's...waking up a bit....i dunno.....so many variables.....
At the moment, the X11 can be used.
I think that's why malc is not answering Myco call either.
Malc's probably had a go with X11 and thought, Ok it works, ...well let em work it out for themselves....
But I know what you mean tester.
Will finish update soon, and look to build a better test unit...something we all can agree on...go from there.

billv wrote:I think that's why malc is not answering Myco call either.

Who said that?

RJHollins wrote:it's unfortunate then ... this could have been an educational opportunity in this public forum.

At least I have some code examples that I can test [and try to learn from] on my machine.

Maybe a new thread will start on this topic.

What is there not to understand about using the right hardware for the job.
It's the same as ripping the videocard out of your computer and complaining your 3D games are slow.
It's that obvious.

MegaHurtz wrote:

RJHollins wrote:it's unfortunate then ... this could have been an educational opportunity in this public forum.

At least I have some code examples that I can test [and try to learn from] on my machine.

Maybe a new thread will start on this topic.

What is there not to understand about using the right hardware for the job.
It's the same as ripping the videocard out of your computer and complaining your 3D games are slow.
It's that obvious.

Well, for one thing ... the definition of 'sample accurate' triggering.

Buying a 'faster' machine may indeed minimize errors ... but that is only a 'band-aid' approach.
A faster machine should allow MORE tracks or processing to take place ... NOT to gloss over.

Sorry ... don't play video games.

Excuse me for saying you would have a hard time maintaining accuracy.
Simply because the peice of hardware you opt to use then (the processor) is not built to be accurate.
So before you dismiss an actual learning opportunity, to substitute things you would like to hear instead.
...But go on. I don't care actually.

MegaHurtz wrote:Excuse me for saying you would have a hard time maintaining accuracy.
Simply because the peice of hardware you opt to use then (the processor) is not built to be accurate.
So before you dismiss an actual learning opportunity, to substitute things you would like to hear instead.
...But go on. I don't care actually.

I haven't a clue what point you're trying to make ...

That same 'processor' seems to handle sample accuracy just fine for things like 44.1k CD ... 96K finds no problem either just to sight a specific example.

Second, the only things I dismiss are suggested NON 'caring' solutions.
My interest in this thread is to possible learn better programming technique/understanding. I will dismiss the child-like attitudes that have permeated this and related threads. This is part of the public forum, and should maintain some level of professionalism.

Happy setbacks

another thread with smoke!

I agree with Mr. Hollins tho, these threads should be free from as much ramble as possible whilst keeping the mutual understanding and respect at the same time. We are all here to learn (most of us) so instead of complaining/taking things personally, lets give each other the respect to try & put FS first and not our ego's or other bullshit.

ahh fuck it, anyone noticed Trog has been in his cave for a while???

Actually think it's sad that these select people see so much negativity in this.
It's going on for about five pages, where the answer was there in the second post.
If we are going to talk ego's, vs actual experience you're losing for 5 pages to actual experience.
Typical ego's response is to be an absolute cry baby and trying to get sympathy, when it should know you completely ignored the right advice. But I know this is inversely true in trying to get the right advice spoonfed.
To later again ignore the right advice. So ok, ill withold it from youz.

Why does everyone have to agree, that's rediculous. Im in no way going out of the way of a good debate.
Mutual riches. And again what I said was repettetive and PC, ill say it again.

Mutual respect is what you get if you are actually trying to understand the input.
Since I completely understand- and agree with rational input, there is no discussion.
Don't even want to pin anybody on my words. But you catch my drift.
No competition

Maybe Trog is a bit sensetive, but I welcome him to the forum. Why be like that?
As you see I enjoy a good ramble.

First of all MH - you are trolling too much. People know your activity on SM forum. Are you sure these forums are for you? If you don't cool down your engines, one day, rather sooner than later - someone will decide to take effective actions in regards to you. Don't blame others if you are removed from both boards then.