If you have a problem or need to report a bug please email : support@dsprobotics.com
There are 3 sections to this support area:
DOWNLOADS: access to product manuals, support files and drivers
HELP & INFORMATION: tutorials and example files for learning or finding pre-made modules for your projects
USER FORUMS: meet with other users and exchange ideas, you can also get help and assistance here
NEW REGISTRATIONS - please contact us if you wish to register on the forum
Users are reminded of the forum rules they sign up to which prohibits any activity that violates any laws including posting material covered by copyright
Intersample peaks
24 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: Intersample peaks
@Martin - why do you use FIR filters for the oversampling? I'm a bit lost here
Also you mention
I'm assuming this is detrimental to any signal, or specific to pulses..?
Also you mention
if you look at the time response of the toolkit filter: a single pulse gets heavily distorted with lots of ringing.
I'm assuming this is detrimental to any signal, or specific to pulses..?
- Drnkhobo
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:13 pm
- Location: ZA
Re: Intersample peaks
Because I thought that most DAC reconstruction filters were linear phase. Now I realize how silly that assumption was!Drnkhobo wrote:why do you use FIR filters for the oversampling?
RECONSTRUCTION FILTERS ARE ANALOG!
In other words, they are certainly not linear phase. So please forget my previous posts in the thread, it is all nonsense.
Not necessarily - I'd say it depends on what you do with it. The toolkit IIR filter has an outstanding frequency response. That's good because it efficiently suppresses aliasing without much high frequency attenuation. This brickwall filter response, however, comes at the price of phase distortion. That's bad because you lose coherence, making percussive sounds less punchy. For the purpose of metering I think the toolkit filter is not a good interpolator (although I do not know which filter would be, see above).Drnkhobo wrote:Also you mentionif you look at the time response of the toolkit filter: a single pulse gets heavily distorted with lots of ringing.
I'm assuming this is detrimental to any signal, or specific to pulses..?
So my personal conclusion is: if you are concerned about intersample peaks, just stay some 1 to 2 dB below the roof (make it 3-6dB if you are very concerned). However, don't bother to be more sophisticated than that unless you really know exactly what happens in the analog path after the DAC.
-
martinvicanek - Posts: 1328
- Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:28 pm
Re: Intersample peaks
Thanks Martin for your comments,
my request regarding explanations about oversamplig,
was right about your technique implemented for this specific context and with the FIR.
my request regarding explanations about oversamplig,
was right about your technique implemented for this specific context and with the FIR.
- Tronic
- Posts: 539
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:59 pm
Re: Intersample peaks
Thanks for the feedback Martin, I guess assumption is the mother of all . . .
I was thinking about IS peaks for use in a plugin. Limiter thingy.
Admittedly I have been stumped for a while on another issue but I'll keep that for another thread
It's embarrassing
I was thinking about IS peaks for use in a plugin. Limiter thingy.
Admittedly I have been stumped for a while on another issue but I'll keep that for another thread
It's embarrassing
- Drnkhobo
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:13 pm
- Location: ZA
24 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 68 guests