Support

If you have a problem or need to report a bug please email : support@dsprobotics.com

There are 3 sections to this support area:

DOWNLOADS: access to product manuals, support files and drivers

HELP & INFORMATION: tutorials and example files for learning or finding pre-made modules for your projects

USER FORUMS: meet with other users and exchange ideas, you can also get help and assistance here

NEW REGISTRATIONS - please contact us if you wish to register on the forum

Users are reminded of the forum rules they sign up to which prohibits any activity that violates any laws including posting material covered by copyright

Midi: Implementation news?

For general discussion related FlowStone

Midi: Implementation news?

Postby Tronic » Tue Sep 11, 2012 5:05 am

I would ask if the new version of FS3 will be implemented
SYSTEM REAL TIME MESSAGES?
If there would be the possibility to set the size of the buffer?
limit is 1024 bytes?
now the existing primitive midi buffer does not collect sysex data?
you will also have in the vst midi sysex?
Tronic
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:59 pm

Re: Midi: Implementation news?

Postby Tronic » Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:46 am

I regret that not get a response
Tronic
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:59 pm

Re: Midi: Implementation news?

Postby support » Mon Sep 17, 2012 5:36 pm

MIDI in FS only currently supports channel and system exclusive messages. This will be the same in FS3. The main difference in FS3 will be that you have precise control over when MIDI messages are sent.

You mentioned the buffer, are you talking about the R&D MIDI Buffer component?
User avatar
support
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:10 pm

Re: Midi: Implementation news?

Postby Tronic » Mon Sep 17, 2012 6:49 pm

support wrote:You mentioned the buffer, are you talking about the R&D MIDI Buffer component?


I meant just that component R&D MIDI Buffer, does not seem to support sysex messages.
FS3 will therefore remain the same, but with a higher accuracy. great news.

I would ask if the System Real Message will be developed in the future,
or there are special reasons could not be implemented?

Thank you for your attention.
Tronic
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:59 pm

Re: Midi: Implementation news?

Postby support » Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:33 pm

We'd need to look into it Tronic. Without doing some digging it's difficult to say if it can be done easily or not.

You'll be able to use Ruby to manipulate MIDI data (including sysex) in FS3 so you could easily make your own MIDI buffer. The R&D component becomes redundant then.
User avatar
support
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:10 pm

Re: Midi: Implementation news?

Postby Tronic » Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:11 am

Many thanks for the answers.
I made this request to have the full support of the standard midi,
because as you say, Ruby provides a valid management system and precision,
but with the lack of System Realtime Message,
forbid the user the ability to exploit the system synchronization with midi:
MTC Quarter Frame, Song Position Pointer, Song Select, Tune Request
MIDI Clock, MIDI Tick, MIDI Start, Stop MIDI, MIDI Continue, Active Sense Reset All.
Very important in the use of the midi.
For example,
to create a project with DSP software / hardware MIDI controller,it would be my main reason to buy a license.
I hope this is possible.
Anyway thanks again for your support, it's nice to have answers, and contribute to the development of ideas.
Tronic
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:59 pm

Re: Midi: Implementation news?

Postby Tronic » Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:18 pm

no chance to know if you work on this?
Tronic
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:59 pm

Re: Midi: Implementation news?

Postby Tronic » Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:20 pm

add to the request, will be provided support for sysex in vst?
Tronic
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:59 pm

Re: Midi: Implementation news?

Postby support » Tue Nov 06, 2012 5:22 pm

Sorry Tronic, with everything else we want to do it's not likely to be top of the list I'm afraid.

For sysex in VST do you want to send sysex to the host or external synths?
User avatar
support
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:10 pm

Re: Midi: Implementation news?

Postby Tronic » Tue Nov 06, 2012 5:26 pm

Sysex to host and external synth.

I made all possible tests on existing components,
and it seems that we can send midi realtime messages with both primitive 'MIDI EVENT' and 'STRING TO SYSEX',
but you can not receive.
I think the most immediate solution is to manage, with the primitive 'SYSEX TO STRING'.
Because it seems that the input waste the opportunity to show values ​​after F7,
and always adds to the string that you receive F0F7 and F0 for the one sent.
Would be nice to see this work in both standalone and in vst.
Tronic
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:59 pm


Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests