If you have a problem or need to report a bug please email : support@dsprobotics.com
There are 3 sections to this support area:
DOWNLOADS: access to product manuals, support files and drivers
HELP & INFORMATION: tutorials and example files for learning or finding pre-made modules for your projects
USER FORUMS: meet with other users and exchange ideas, you can also get help and assistance here
NEW REGISTRATIONS - please contact us if you wish to register on the forum
Users are reminded of the forum rules they sign up to which prohibits any activity that violates any laws including posting material covered by copyright
The Quilcom Mystery: Hopefully not a mystery to use!
18 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
The Quilcom Mystery: Hopefully not a mystery to use!
Hello fellow FlowStone addicts!
I had the idea to see what would happen if I had a 16 partial additive synth (plus sub) where each partial could be amplitude modulated by a poly LFO, bipolar for phase inversion. What if each LFO ran at a different frequency and amount? What if the parameters could be randomised? What would 2 sound like in stereo? And so on…
The result of my experiments is manifested in the Quilcom Mystery synth. I focused on making pads and soundscapes for the presets because that seemed to be its natural destiny.
Of course you can make all sorts of pads on any synth, and many synths are very capable of making evolving, moving soundscapes, so this is an exploration of a very specific technique, rather than a do-it-all pad and soundscape maker.
Here’s the YouTube video:
https://youtu.be/sAwvUC8Uf0k
Here’s the download with all the usual stuff in the zip:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/5vcdvkx2cmf7r ... 1.zip?dl=0
I had a lot of fun actually playing this and especially on headphones. I hope you do too!
Cheers
Spogg
I had the idea to see what would happen if I had a 16 partial additive synth (plus sub) where each partial could be amplitude modulated by a poly LFO, bipolar for phase inversion. What if each LFO ran at a different frequency and amount? What if the parameters could be randomised? What would 2 sound like in stereo? And so on…
The result of my experiments is manifested in the Quilcom Mystery synth. I focused on making pads and soundscapes for the presets because that seemed to be its natural destiny.
Of course you can make all sorts of pads on any synth, and many synths are very capable of making evolving, moving soundscapes, so this is an exploration of a very specific technique, rather than a do-it-all pad and soundscape maker.
Here’s the YouTube video:
https://youtu.be/sAwvUC8Uf0k
Here’s the download with all the usual stuff in the zip:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/5vcdvkx2cmf7r ... 1.zip?dl=0
I had a lot of fun actually playing this and especially on headphones. I hope you do too!
Cheers
Spogg
-
Spogg - Posts: 3358
- Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 4:24 pm
- Location: Birmingham, England
Re: The Quilcom Mystery: Hopefully not a mystery to use!
Ough Rex. really mystical sound!
it seems cool for the new retro wave, you can make trap pads like in Korean bands, very useful)
THX!
it seems cool for the new retro wave, you can make trap pads like in Korean bands, very useful)
THX!
Creative Technology for Bold Player's!
-
DigiTonix - Posts: 136
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 11:28 am
Re: The Quilcom Mystery: Hopefully not a mystery to use!
DigiTonix wrote:Ough Rex. really mystical sound!
it seems cool for the new retro wave, you can make trap pads like in Korean bands, very useful)
THX!
Thank you!
I have no idea about musical genres though, so I take your word for it. I always thought that a trap was for catching mice and stuff.
-
Spogg - Posts: 3358
- Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 4:24 pm
- Location: Birmingham, England
Re: The Quilcom Mystery: Hopefully not a mystery to use!
Looks like my ADHDidi post had some use after all, if only inspirational
We have to train ourselves so that we can improvise on anything... a bird, a sock, a fuming beaker! This, too, can be music. Anything can be music. -Biff Debris
-
Duckett - Posts: 132
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2015 12:39 am
Re: The Quilcom Mystery: Hopefully not a mystery to use!
But it is really very suitable for a trap, it sounds like that, as if Rex had thought of it, maybe he works for 69)) I'm kidding, of course, but listen for yourself ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TBvISmc21s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TBvISmc21s
Creative Technology for Bold Player's!
-
DigiTonix - Posts: 136
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 11:28 am
Re: The Quilcom Mystery: Hopefully not a mystery to use!
Spogg wrote:I have no idea about musical genres though, so I take your word for it. I always thought that a trap was for catching mice and stuff.
Hold on, I'm coming to the rescue!
When you take the low tempo music, people usually rap to, but have no vocals and replace the kick with a long decayed 808-kick (so, a sine wave with a fast pitch envelope decaying out on an actual bass note) - that's called trap.
"There lies the dog buried" (German saying translated literally)
- tulamide
- Posts: 2714
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2014 2:48 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: The Quilcom Mystery: Hopefully not a mystery to use!
Fantastic idea. Working on a quite similar project in those days and I have to say that the new gadgets you use in this are pure inspiration. Thank you for sharing
I have one off topic question. In this synth you use a pure synthesis. No sampling. Let's say you would like to involve a single sample channel which would be mixed with rest. To create a proper continuous "infinite legato" pad sound with the sample, you'll need to loop the sample correctly by using crossfade points. I saw you already did it in your "Bridgit".
My question: Is there any way to find the perfect corssfade points where the looping legato sounds smoothly continuous with no typical amputations?
I have one off topic question. In this synth you use a pure synthesis. No sampling. Let's say you would like to involve a single sample channel which would be mixed with rest. To create a proper continuous "infinite legato" pad sound with the sample, you'll need to loop the sample correctly by using crossfade points. I saw you already did it in your "Bridgit".
My question: Is there any way to find the perfect corssfade points where the looping legato sounds smoothly continuous with no typical amputations?
-
kortezzzz - Posts: 763
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:21 pm
Re: The Quilcom Mystery: Hopefully not a mystery to use!
kortezzzz wrote:My question: Is there any way to find the perfect corssfade points where the looping legato sounds smoothly continuous with no typical amputations?
If there is a way I don’t know it!
What you could think about is using a granular technique but on a large scale rather than tiny fragments. When a grain is created it generally has a “window” whereby a section of the clip is faded in and out. The starting point of the grain in the clip moves forward and eventually wraps around, so each grain is unique and the grain creation rate determines the density of the sound, since grains overlap. This overlapping causes a blending of multiple grains which tends to reduce amplitude variations. It also means that when initially played you hear just the first grain fade in and the multiplicity then increases up to a point determined by the creation rate and the grain duration.
I don’t think that’s what you meant though.
-
Spogg - Posts: 3358
- Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 4:24 pm
- Location: Birmingham, England
Re: The Quilcom Mystery: Hopefully not a mystery to use!
Not sure if I understand that, but how I work with samples, when they have to perfectly loop is, that I record 3 times the length of it, then cut the part in the middle. It will be perfectly looped, especially with FXs applied, like echos or reverbs, who blend into the following beats. No need for crossfades.
If you're lazy and don't record your own soundscapes, but use one shots from other musicians, you have to go zero-crossing at similar rms. But that will never sound as good as above method.
If you're lazy and don't record your own soundscapes, but use one shots from other musicians, you have to go zero-crossing at similar rms. But that will never sound as good as above method.
"There lies the dog buried" (German saying translated literally)
- tulamide
- Posts: 2714
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2014 2:48 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: The Quilcom Mystery: Hopefully not a mystery to use!
Interestingly, what Tom described, it looks like an RR algorithm, since it seems I created such samples in the Extreme Music Converter. but maybe I'm wrong ...
I used Lethal (https://www.lethalaudio.com) rompler a little, many sounds are very dry in it, it even sounds cheap, But I like this sound, because there is a very clean gluing of samples, if you know what I mean, (About dryness and purity of sounds)
I also know that the synth core Lethal is a CWI Tech sampler (https://www.tx16wx.com), apparently they created it to order, for a small company ..)
After adding later:
It seems to me that if you cross Letal and this synth of Rex + add layers, it will be the best synth in the world, just not everyone chops the chip) But imagine how it would sound!
Sorry if I wrote a lot of things off topic)
I used Lethal (https://www.lethalaudio.com) rompler a little, many sounds are very dry in it, it even sounds cheap, But I like this sound, because there is a very clean gluing of samples, if you know what I mean, (About dryness and purity of sounds)
I also know that the synth core Lethal is a CWI Tech sampler (https://www.tx16wx.com), apparently they created it to order, for a small company ..)
After adding later:
It seems to me that if you cross Letal and this synth of Rex + add layers, it will be the best synth in the world, just not everyone chops the chip) But imagine how it would sound!
Sorry if I wrote a lot of things off topic)
Creative Technology for Bold Player's!
-
DigiTonix - Posts: 136
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 11:28 am
18 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Mirek Suk and 52 guests