Page 3 of 4
Re: Ruby Counter
Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 1:39 pm
by billv
Wow Trog, this thing really delivers a
big performance boost.
While testing v3 timer PPQ Circuit for sub-sampling possibilities,
with speed increases, it went like this...
green counter's (currently runs at) 1/16 , 0.125
highest stable timing ability.... 1/128 , 0.015625
first sign of trouble........... 1/256 , 0.0078125
Ruby Counter....
highest stable timing ability.... 1/4096 , 0.000488281
first sign of trouble.............. 1/8192 , 0.000244141
(Note: Ruby counter used as direct replacement for green counter-no other changes made to test)
And this is just one example.......imagine gains to be made across a whole schematic.

Thanks again.
Re: Ruby Counter
Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 4:42 pm
by Tronic
You tried to connect to the ticker generator, a simple sample and hold green?
the greens have a trig limit them too. those who know the size?
when exceeded will turn off the ticker ruby.
therefore, it really is possible to use a ruby timer to increase above the ratio in the green?
for now I still have not answered, because there are a number of Inconsistency,
both in the green side than in the ruby side, thinking about the ticker.
then the discussion is open.
Re: Ruby Counter
Posted: Sun May 12, 2013 8:41 pm
by billv
Tronic wrote:You tried to connect to the ticker generator, a simple sample and hold green?
Yeh, it only has to process
1 trigger during the count....
Tronic wrote:the greens have a trig limit them too
Thanks for tip, never really thought about that...I just keep going till i get an issue.......
Tronic wrote:when exceeded will turn off the ticker ruby.
Wow, that's a ripper.......thanks heaps for that
Tronic wrote:it really is possible to use a ruby timer to increase above the ratio in the green?
From the test I did, seems yes. but I'm still trying to work it out, the actual equasion sending the trigger
from ruby was still in green.....really not 100% sure yet
But no need to take my word for it.....test is easily re-created...
Download v3 timer...punch in the numbers......
Or if others ran their own performance tests, we can get definate answer quicker

Re: Ruby Counter
Posted: Mon May 13, 2013 3:13 am
by Tronic
billv wrote:Tronic wrote:it really is possible to use a ruby timer to increase above the ratio in the green?
From the test I did, seems yes. but I'm still trying to work it out, the actual equasion sending the trigger
from ruby was still in green.....really not 100% sure yet
mine and not only my answer, says it is not yet possible with greens.
however, it will be put on hold and performed only when the CPU becomes available.
then you will only have an overload of requests if the CPU is busy,
and it seems to play everything correctly, but it would not be sample accurate.
however mix green and ruby do not maintain a process sample accurate.
this is what I think, free to disprove the opposite.
Re: Ruby Counter
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2014 10:08 am
by JB_AU
Awesome! You saved me from an aneurism, you rock!
Re: Ruby Counter
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2014 10:02 pm
by FluxCapacitance
Trog,
This is rad. You can never comment too much. Your tutorials are excellent.
I've been learning Ruby, but the FS interpreter is different in many ways. It's hard to tell what methods are built in as FS only, even after reading the 200+ page manual 3 times. The extra clarification is great.
Thanks again.
Re: Ruby Counter
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 1:35 pm
by trogluddite
Thanks, you're welcome!
FluxCapacitance wrote:t's hard to tell what methods are built in as FS only, even after reading the 200+ page manual 3 times
Funny you should say that...
Flowstone API Docs
Re: Ruby Counter
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 2:25 pm
by JB_AU
^^ It's like being a kid next to a broken lolly machine, it just keeps giving

Re: Ruby Counter
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 3:24 pm
by trogluddite

Well we've already had a "playing with Trog's knob" thread, so....
...NO NO NO NO!!! Ill stop right there before I have to ban myself from the forum!

Re: Ruby Counter
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 4:40 am
by FluxCapacitance
trogluddite wrote:Thanks, you're welcome!
FluxCapacitance wrote:t's hard to tell what methods are built in as FS only, even after reading the 200+ page manual 3 times
Funny you should say that...
Flowstone API Docs
Thanks! Just got it a few minutes ago.