If you have a problem or need to report a bug please email : support@dsprobotics.com
There are 3 sections to this support area:
DOWNLOADS: access to product manuals, support files and drivers
HELP & INFORMATION: tutorials and example files for learning or finding pre-made modules for your projects
USER FORUMS: meet with other users and exchange ideas, you can also get help and assistance here
NEW REGISTRATIONS - please contact us if you wish to register on the forum
Users are reminded of the forum rules they sign up to which prohibits any activity that violates any laws including posting material covered by copyright
Question About Converting from Flowstone v3.0.8.1 to v3.0.6
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Question About Converting from Flowstone v3.0.8.1 to v3.0.6
I have a fairly large schematic which I want to convert from Flowstone 3.0.8.1. back to v3.0.6 pebble.
Must I rebuild the whole schematic which was originally done in Flowstone v3.0.8.1 from scratch in Flowstone v3.0.6 or can you export it as is from v3.0.6?
I tried the latter option already, does not work. Both my laptops display an error message "out of memory" but on the one laptop, I have 16 GBytes RAM and the other laptop 32 GBytes RAM. This only occurs when I tried to export the schematic from Flowstone v3.0.6 but in v3.0.8.1 there is no such problem.
Any advice to help is welcome.
Must I rebuild the whole schematic which was originally done in Flowstone v3.0.8.1 from scratch in Flowstone v3.0.6 or can you export it as is from v3.0.6?
I tried the latter option already, does not work. Both my laptops display an error message "out of memory" but on the one laptop, I have 16 GBytes RAM and the other laptop 32 GBytes RAM. This only occurs when I tried to export the schematic from Flowstone v3.0.6 but in v3.0.8.1 there is no such problem.
Any advice to help is welcome.
-
tiffy - Posts: 400
- Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 12:14 pm
Re: Question About Converting from Flowstone v3.0.8.1 to v3.
I dont think you can save them backwards
- adamszabo
- Posts: 667
- Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:21 am
Re: Question About Converting from Flowstone v3.0.8.1 to v3.
Backwards is not possible. But, you might have a good chance at copy/pasting from one to the other. However, try that in smaller chunks, as I'm not sure how changes in prims are handled when copied between versions.
"There lies the dog buried" (German saying translated literally)
- tulamide
- Posts: 2714
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2014 2:48 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Question About Converting from Flowstone v3.0.8.1 to v3.
I may have misunderstood the problem, but I wonder why you want to do the conversion to 3.06 if you can export the VST from 3.08.1 successfully.
The reason for wanting to do this may be relevant.
The reason for wanting to do this may be relevant.
-
Spogg - Posts: 3358
- Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 4:24 pm
- Location: Birmingham, England
Re: Question About Converting from Flowstone v3.0.8.1 to v3.
Quote: "I may have misunderstood the problem, but I wonder why you want to do the conversion to 3.06 if you can export the VST from 3.08.1 successfully. The reason for wanting to do this may be relevant."
The reason being as I was informed by Tulamide: "And don't use 3.0.8.1, it is a bugged and slow version (for example, Ruby only runs at half speed)".
The reason being as I was informed by Tulamide: "And don't use 3.0.8.1, it is a bugged and slow version (for example, Ruby only runs at half speed)".
-
tiffy - Posts: 400
- Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 12:14 pm
Re: Question About Converting from Flowstone v3.0.8.1 to v3.
tiffy wrote:Quote: "I may have misunderstood the problem, but I wonder why you want to do the conversion to 3.06 if you can export the VST from 3.08.1 successfully. The reason for wanting to do this may be relevant."
The reason being as I was informed by Tulamide: "And don't use 3.0.8.1, it is a bugged and slow version (for example, Ruby only runs at half speed)".
Fair point!
-
Spogg - Posts: 3358
- Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 4:24 pm
- Location: Birmingham, England
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 59 guests