If you have a problem or need to report a bug please email : support@dsprobotics.com
There are 3 sections to this support area:
DOWNLOADS: access to product manuals, support files and drivers
HELP & INFORMATION: tutorials and example files for learning or finding pre-made modules for your projects
USER FORUMS: meet with other users and exchange ideas, you can also get help and assistance here
NEW REGISTRATIONS - please contact us if you wish to register on the forum
Users are reminded of the forum rules they sign up to which prohibits any activity that violates any laws including posting material covered by copyright
Loudness Meter-Comparison Tool - EBU R128
Re: Loudness Meter-Comparison Tool - EBU R128
Oki I open a new post for this.
All what I try fail!!
All what I try fail!!
-
wlangfor@uoguelph.ca
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2018 5:50 pm
- Location: North Bay, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Loudness Meter-Comparison Tool - EBU R128
I am working on a project which deals with distance and relativity to proximity (pan). And K weighting provides Me an industry standard I can comparatively use for a project which use dba to frequency and distance calculations.
Project Screenshot:
Project Link:
http://www.flowstone.co.uk/support/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=13661&sid=ea2...
Is it OK if I use Your .fsm example towards this end? My curiosity and rationale has been scientific but I suppose upon any amount of technically accurate success I may want (a) product from the fruition of that to be commercial. Can You, Youlean Please give Me Your thoughts on that?
If strictly free I think that would be ok too; But what I am doing is creating a calibrated low-pass system which varies upon pan so as to replace Pan law. It's only amplitude after all and dependent on that distance some frequencies could not be heard.
I'm trying to make a new standard and it seems fitting that your name be involved in that cause?
It would be a lot simpler if there were DBFs to DBSPL and DBA conversion calculators, but in many tenses that is called impractical and impossible. Perhaps K weighting and Your example would lead me to a solution that perhaps could be accepted as a credible replacement for pan, at least in VST and AU, AAX; Assuming that the algorithm was re-invented, I believe the implications could be very enlightening
.
Project Screenshot:
- Distance Proximity virtualizer screenshot
- distance standalone.png (70.62 KiB) Viewed 7445 times
Project Link:
http://www.flowstone.co.uk/support/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=13661&sid=ea2...
Is it OK if I use Your .fsm example towards this end? My curiosity and rationale has been scientific but I suppose upon any amount of technically accurate success I may want (a) product from the fruition of that to be commercial. Can You, Youlean Please give Me Your thoughts on that?
If strictly free I think that would be ok too; But what I am doing is creating a calibrated low-pass system which varies upon pan so as to replace Pan law. It's only amplitude after all and dependent on that distance some frequencies could not be heard.
I'm trying to make a new standard and it seems fitting that your name be involved in that cause?
It would be a lot simpler if there were DBFs to DBSPL and DBA conversion calculators, but in many tenses that is called impractical and impossible. Perhaps K weighting and Your example would lead me to a solution that perhaps could be accepted as a credible replacement for pan, at least in VST and AU, AAX; Assuming that the algorithm was re-invented, I believe the implications could be very enlightening
.