If you have a problem or need to report a bug please email : support@dsprobotics.com
There are 3 sections to this support area:
DOWNLOADS: access to product manuals, support files and drivers
HELP & INFORMATION: tutorials and example files for learning or finding pre-made modules for your projects
USER FORUMS: meet with other users and exchange ideas, you can also get help and assistance here
NEW REGISTRATIONS - please contact us if you wish to register on the forum
Users are reminded of the forum rules they sign up to which prohibits any activity that violates any laws including posting material covered by copyright
Have you had any troubles with 64 bit wrappers?
-
Perfect Human Interface
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 7:32 pm
Have you had any troubles with 64 bit wrappers?
Just a simple inquiry: have you tested any of your Flowstone VST exports in existing 64 bit wrappers and have you run into any issues doing so?
Of course many people already use 64 bit DAWs, but some of those DAWs also contain their own 32 bit wrappers (and I believe others are available from other parties?). So I'm hoping to find out if people have had good or bad experiences with any of these wrappers.
Of course many people already use 64 bit DAWs, but some of those DAWs also contain their own 32 bit wrappers (and I believe others are available from other parties?). So I'm hoping to find out if people have had good or bad experiences with any of these wrappers.
-
CoreStylerz
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 2:19 am
- Location: italy
- Contact:
Re: Have you had any troubles with 64 bit wrappers?
Perfect Human Interface wrote:Just a simple inquiry: have you tested any of your Flowstone VST exports in existing 64 bit wrappers and have you run into any issues doing so?
Of course many people already use 64 bit DAWs, but some of those DAWs also contain their own 32 bit wrappers (and I believe others are available from other parties?). So I'm hoping to find out if people have had good or bad experiences with any of these wrappers.
I've tried all my plugs with Cockos reaper bridge (auto) and they works very well. Dominus i'ts just a little slower and sometimes it crackles (when changing patch) but are very usable.
Fl studio wrapping works just cool.
The problem on the marketing side is just there's a stigma to non-native 64 bit plugins.
Many people will avoid them. I receiving weekly request for 64 bit plugins.
Need my support for app development, website or custom scripts?
PM me if you are interested.
Experienced Java, J2EE, PHP, Javascript, Angular, Cloud Solutions developer.
PM me if you are interested.
Experienced Java, J2EE, PHP, Javascript, Angular, Cloud Solutions developer.
Re: Have you had any troubles with 64 bit wrappers?
Tried my synths on reaper 64bit, cubase5 (with a jbridge), studio one2 (with a jbridge), bitwig studio (which works as 64bit by default on 64bit OS, but still loads 32bit plugins that operate with the limitation of 3.25gb ram). Best results on reaper; It probably has the best built-in bridge and it's cpu meter shows the the best performances compared the other DAWs I mentioned. On cubase, works fine but sometimes I get few small cpu spikes when moving the gui or when switching presets. studio one2 showed the worst performances so far and I got spikes from it very often.
On bitwig, everything worked Ok, but small spikes occur when the gui called after being hidden.
Seems like if FS gonna move into 64bit world and add proper multicore support, all the cpu\memory problems will be gone with it. So far, most of my bad behavior problems caused by FS gui management and the preset system (on some DAWs).
On bitwig, everything worked Ok, but small spikes occur when the gui called after being hidden.
Seems like if FS gonna move into 64bit world and add proper multicore support, all the cpu\memory problems will be gone with it. So far, most of my bad behavior problems caused by FS gui management and the preset system (on some DAWs).