Reaper Performance meter VS actual CPU usage.

For general discussion related FlowStone
Post Reply
User avatar
lalalandsynth
Posts: 600
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:48 pm

Reaper Performance meter VS actual CPU usage.

Post by lalalandsynth »

My plugin shows 0.4% cpu usage in Reaper Performance meter , but almost 17% in my task manager.
Just wondering why the discrepancy ?
adamszabo
Posts: 667
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:21 am

Re: Reaper Performance meter VS actual CPU usage.

Post by adamszabo »

Because the cpu meter doesnt account for multi-core. It only shows the CPU of 1 core I believe. The new FlowStones should fix that
User avatar
lalalandsynth
Posts: 600
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:48 pm

Re: Reaper Performance meter VS actual CPU usage.

Post by lalalandsynth »

I see , thanks!
tulamide
Posts: 2714
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2014 2:48 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Reaper Performance meter VS actual CPU usage.

Post by tulamide »

You can't mix all the different sources!

Reaper itself is known to show more "optimistic" values than the Task Manager. But the latter doesn't just show pure thread performance, but also takes into account small details that lock the CPU without really using it. And Flowstone shows only pure audio processing, it completely ignores everything else, like graphics performance, user input, etc.

If you want to know how your plugin performs, the only way is to do the same things on your plugin and a plugin that you consider lightweight, and then compare the numbers on one performance meter. The difference as a percentage will give you a hint. You won't get closer to the real performance than this.
"There lies the dog buried" (German saying translated literally)
User avatar
lalalandsynth
Posts: 600
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 12:48 pm

Re: Reaper Performance meter VS actual CPU usage.

Post by lalalandsynth »

Also, I have wondered why a plugin say takes 12% and then I add another instance of the same plugin , almost no CPU increase , why is that ?
Post Reply